2,852
edits
Framing: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Look at this picture of a rabbit, can you see its long ears...?'''[[File:Duck-Rabbit_illusion.jpg|700x700px|alt text|center]] | '''Look at this picture of a rabbit, can you see its long ears...?'''[[File:Duck-Rabbit_illusion.jpg|700x700px|alt text|center]] | ||
[[File:Duck or rabbit?.jpg|alt=Duck or rabbit?|thumb|Duck or rabbit? Or both?]] | [[File:Duck or rabbit?.jpg|alt=Duck or rabbit?|thumb|Duck or rabbit? Or both?]] | ||
'''...actually it's a duck.''' If you haven't seen this picture before, the initial comment above | '''...actually it's a duck.''' If you haven't seen this picture before, the initial comment above will prime you to think it is a rabbit, where in fact it could easily be either a '''duck''' or a '''rabbit'''. The brain determined to accept the suggested duck option rather than to critically assess what the author suggested as it takes more energy. This is called framing, it occurs when information is hazy and requires energy to discern so you default to mimic a third parties opinion. | ||
The issue is the third party. Without the priming you might have known that it was both a duck and a rabbit but it was presented by an author (an authority) as only the former. It is the perceived authority of the presenter which enables the efficacy of framing much like the placebo effect. i.e. doctors, in a white coat giving you a medicine has been shown to make the effect of a medicine more potent. Lastly try this very ambiguous image, of 16 rectangles, can you see them? | The issue is the third party. Without the priming you might have known that it was both a duck and a rabbit but it was presented by an author (an authority) as only the former. It is the perceived authority of the presenter which enables the efficacy of framing much like the placebo effect. i.e. doctors, in a white coat giving you a medicine has been shown to make the effect of a medicine more potent. Lastly try this very ambiguous image, of 16 rectangles, can you see them? | ||