Meta-Ethics

From BurnZero

While normal ethics addresses such questions as "What should I do?", evaluating specific practices and principles of action, meta-ethics addresses questions such as "What is good?" and "How can we tell what is good from what is bad?". At its core meta-ethics addresses the relativity of ethics (or moral relativism) which is the concept that something that is deemed good might not be good for everyone i.e. it is simply a matter of contextual framing.

Isn't Good or Evil, just a matter of perspective?

As information has become more of a commodity for clicks than proliferated on the merits of its objective truth this Good / Evil dichotomy. With the development of the Library of Babel (the internet contains sufficient information to equally disprove or support any theorem) fact is become increasingly difficult to discern.

Share your opinion