Thought Paradoxes: Difference between revisions

From BurnZero
(Created page with "A paradox is a claim or issue that either seems to yield two completely different (yet plausible) results or offers evidence for something that defies our preconceived notions. For centuries, paradoxes have been a crucial component of philosophical thought. They are constantly ready to challenge our understanding of seemingly straightforward situations, flipping what we may believe to be true, and presenting us with situations that are both demonstrably plausible and dem...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A paradox is a claim or issue that either seems to yield two completely different (yet plausible) results or offers evidence for something that defies our preconceived notions. For centuries, paradoxes have been a crucial component of philosophical thought. They are constantly ready to challenge our understanding of seemingly straightforward situations, flipping what we may believe to be true, and presenting us with situations that are both demonstrably plausible and demonstrably impossible. Thought paradoxes are different to logical fallacies as logic is often used to process reach the conclusion of paradoxes, i.e. it is not the journey but the destination which is the issue. Confused? You ought to be.
'''A paradox is a claim or issue that either seems to yield two completely different (yet plausible) results or offers evidence for something that defies our preconceived notions'''. Thought paradoxes are different to [[Popular Delusions|popular delusions]] as paradoxes are logical, they seem to question the systems by which we communicate whether this is semantics in our language or mathematical principles in our common logic. Below is a list of the most common thought paradoxes:[[File:Liar Paradox2.png|alt=Liar Paradox|thumb|'''Figure 1'''. Liar Paradox]]
 
* '''Achilles and the Tortoise ([[Zeno's paradox|Zeno's Paradox]])''' - finite value can always be divided an infinite number of times, no matter how small its divisions might become. Related to the [[Binary versus analogue|binary / analogue duality]].
Below is a list of the most common thought paradoxes:
* [[Allais' Paradox|'''Allais' Paradox''']] - mathematical paradox of choice.
 
* '''Liar paradox''' - logical semantic paradox (see '''Figure 1''').
* Achilles and the Tortoise
* '''[[Card Paradox]]''' - a [[framing]] paradox.
* Bootstrap Paradox
* '''Bootstrap Paradox''' - a fantastical paradox considering how objects are conceived if time travel were possible.
* Boy or Girl Paradox
* Card Paradox
* Crocodile Paradox
* Dichotomy Paradox
* Fletchers Paradox
* [[Allais' Paradox]]

Latest revision as of 03:38, 31 December 2023

A paradox is a claim or issue that either seems to yield two completely different (yet plausible) results or offers evidence for something that defies our preconceived notions. Thought paradoxes are different to popular delusions as paradoxes are logical, they seem to question the systems by which we communicate whether this is semantics in our language or mathematical principles in our common logic. Below is a list of the most common thought paradoxes:

Liar Paradox
Figure 1. Liar Paradox
  • Achilles and the Tortoise (Zeno's Paradox) - finite value can always be divided an infinite number of times, no matter how small its divisions might become. Related to the binary / analogue duality.
  • Allais' Paradox - mathematical paradox of choice.
  • Liar paradox - logical semantic paradox (see Figure 1).
  • Card Paradox - a framing paradox.
  • Bootstrap Paradox - a fantastical paradox considering how objects are conceived if time travel were possible.

Share your opinion