Meta-Ethics: Difference between revisions

Meta-Ethics (view source)

338 bytes added , 03:33, 6 December 2022

m

no edit summary

2,900

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[File:Good or evil.jpg|thumb|Isn't Good or Evil, just a matter of perspective?]]
-'''While normal ethics addresses such questions as "''What should I do?''", evaluating specific practices and principles of action, meta-ethics addresses questions such as "''What is good?''" and "''How can we tell what is good from what is bad?''".''' At its core it addresses the [[relativity of ethics]] (or moral relativism) which is the concept that something that is deemed ''good'' might not be good for everyone i.e. it is simply a matter of contextual [[framing]].
+'''While normal ethics addresses such questions as "''What should I do?''", evaluating specific practices and principles of action, meta-ethics addresses questions such as "''What is good?''" and "''How can we tell what is good from what is bad?''".''' At its core meta-ethics addresses the [[relativity of ethics]] (or moral relativism) which is the concept that something that is deemed ''good'' might not be good for everyone i.e. it is simply a matter of contextual [[framing]].
+As information has become more of a commodity for clicks than proliferated on the merits of its objective truth this Good / Evil dichotomy. With the development of the [[Library of Babel]] (the internet contains sufficient information to equally disprove or support a theorem) TRUTH is become increasingly difficult to discern.