2,865
edits
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
5.0% of adults in the world suffer from depression<ref>https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression</ref>. The brain plays crucial roles in promoting survival and reproduction, so the pressures of evolution should have left our brains resistant to such high rates of malfunction. Mental disorders should generally be rare and be getting rarer — ''so why is depression so common and even more growing?''[[File:Pacifier.jpg|alt=Pacifier|thumb|Companies will always have a solution to sell even if it is not the solution.]] | 5.0% of adults in the world suffer from depression<ref>https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression</ref>. The brain plays crucial roles in promoting survival and reproduction, so the pressures of evolution should have left our brains resistant to such high rates of malfunction. Mental disorders should generally be rare and be getting rarer — ''so why is depression so common and even more growing?''[[File:Pacifier.jpg|alt=Pacifier|thumb|'''Figure 3'''. Companies will always have a solution to sell even if it is not the solution.]] | ||
Depression is a subjective issue with little to no objective parameters, one can only assume that the disease is partly caused by internal biochemistry and external circumstance. '''Part of the appeal of the internal biochemistry rationale is its apparent simplicity, efficiency, and exemption from blame, along with the notion that it “optimizes” both patient and treatment. Everyday struggles are recast as “symptoms of ‘real medical conditions.’” Through lowered diagnostic thresholds, those conditions are then pronounced widespread, with virtually everyone considered susceptible. Blame evaporates; the suffering is “caused by neurochemical aberrations that are outside conscious control.” And then the problem is typically rendered as “easily treated,” with drugs presented as “working to correct the underlying somatic malfunction.”''' | Depression is a subjective issue with little to no objective parameters, one can only assume that the disease is partly caused by internal biochemistry and external circumstance. '''Part of the appeal of the internal biochemistry rationale is its apparent simplicity, efficiency, and exemption from blame, along with the notion that it “optimizes” both patient and treatment. Everyday struggles are recast as “symptoms of ‘real medical conditions.’” Through lowered diagnostic thresholds, those conditions are then pronounced widespread, with virtually everyone considered susceptible. Blame evaporates; the suffering is “caused by neurochemical aberrations that are outside conscious control.” And then the problem is typically rendered as “easily treated,” with drugs presented as “working to correct the underlying somatic malfunction.”''' | ||