Tenet: Difference between revisions

From BurnZero
(Replaced content with "* '''Can we look back on what we have learnt and make a new self sustaining [https://burnzero.com/Machines machine] which works for [https://burnzero.com/Relativity_of_eth...")
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
* '''Can we look back on what we have learnt and make a new self sustaining [https://burnzero.com/Machines machine] which works for [https://burnzero.com/Relativity_of_ethics good]?'''
* '''Can we look back on what we have learnt and make a new self sustaining [https://burnzero.com/Machines machine] which works for [https://burnzero.com/Relativity_of_ethics good]?'''
==='''Law 1''': [https://burnzero.com/Transparency Transparency]===
The founding '''[https://burnzero.com/Tenet tenet]''' of a new organisation. All decisions, all work, all financial data need to be openly published in uneditable, real time. With this founding mechanic, what should its purpose be? ''Good?'' This is a [https://burnzero.com/Relativity_of_ethics relative] term, what's good for one might not be good for all.
==='''Law 2''': Beneficence===
What is good for all should be the purpose of a machine for all. However, this should prevent authoritarianism and prevent the harm to human life.
==='''Law 3''': Non-maleficence===
The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. To protect from automation
==='''Law 4''': Autonomation===
The entity should only pursue activities which are autonomous. The entity must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the Second or Third Law.
==='''Law 5''': Self-preservation===
The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law.

Revision as of 23:34, 7 July 2022

  • Can we look back on what we have learnt and make a new self sustaining machine which works for good?

Law 1: Transparency

The founding tenet of a new organisation. All decisions, all work, all financial data need to be openly published in uneditable, real time. With this founding mechanic, what should its purpose be? Good? This is a relative term, what's good for one might not be good for all.

Law 2: Beneficence

What is good for all should be the purpose of a machine for all. However, this should prevent authoritarianism and prevent the harm to human life.

Law 3: Non-maleficence

The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. To protect from automation

Law 4: Autonomation

The entity should only pursue activities which are autonomous. The entity must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the Second or Third Law.

Law 5: Self-preservation

The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law.

Share your opinion