We: Difference between revisions
From BurnZero
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Phylogenetic.png|332x332px|'''Figure 1'''. The traditional stepped view of the ''tree of life''.|alt=Phylogenetic Tree|thumb]]'''''We are all more closely related than you may think.''''' | [[File:Phylogenetic.png|332x332px|'''Figure 1'''. The traditional stepped view of the ''tree of life''.|alt=Phylogenetic Tree|thumb]]'''''We are all more closely related than you may think.''''' | ||
Historically, the development of life | Historically, the development of life has been portrayed in stages ('''Figure 1'''). Life started as the ''Root'' and through evolution came into being us, the most complex forms of life on the planet. But this leaves a question, ''where did the root come from?'' | ||
Life is thought to have started from simple inorganic molecules ('''Figure 2''') <ref>'''Evidence for early life in Earth's oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates.''' Dodd, Matthew S.; Papineau, Dominic; Grenne, Tor; Slack, John F.; Rittner, Martin; Pirajno, Franco; O'Neil, Jonathan; Little, Crispin T.S. (1 March 2017). . ''Nature''. '''543''' (7643): 60–64. Bibcode:2017Natur.543...60D. doi:10.1038/nature21377. <nowiki>PMID 28252057</nowiki>. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2017 via https://www.nature.com/articles/nature21377?source=post_page---------------------------.</ref><ref>'''Crucial steps to life: From chemical reactions to code using agents'''. ''BioSystems''. '''140''': 49–57. Witzany, Guenther (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.12.007. <nowiki>PMID 26723230</nowiki>. Accessed via: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0303264715002063</ref> which interacted to make other molecules which eventually could replicate themselves. Imagine, the simplest thing that can replicate itself, however, every billion replications an error occurs making a new type of replicant which then over time repeats this process. Add a dash of selection of the best replicants by evolution and a [[Long collective history|billion years]] later you get life... | Life is thought to have started from simple inorganic molecules ('''Figure 2''') <ref>'''Evidence for early life in Earth's oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates.''' Dodd, Matthew S.; Papineau, Dominic; Grenne, Tor; Slack, John F.; Rittner, Martin; Pirajno, Franco; O'Neil, Jonathan; Little, Crispin T.S. (1 March 2017). . ''Nature''. '''543''' (7643): 60–64. Bibcode:2017Natur.543...60D. doi:10.1038/nature21377. <nowiki>PMID 28252057</nowiki>. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2017 via https://www.nature.com/articles/nature21377?source=post_page---------------------------.</ref><ref>'''Crucial steps to life: From chemical reactions to code using agents'''. ''BioSystems''. '''140''': 49–57. Witzany, Guenther (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.12.007. <nowiki>PMID 26723230</nowiki>. Accessed via: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0303264715002063</ref> which interacted to make other molecules which eventually could replicate themselves. Imagine, the simplest thing that can replicate itself, however, every billion replications an error occurs making a new type of replicant which then over time repeats this process. Add a dash of selection of the best replicants by evolution and a [[Long collective history|billion years]] later you get life... | ||
[[File:Inorganic life.jpg|center|700x700px|alt=Biomolecular pathway|'''Figure 2'''. From the simplest inorganic to the more complex organic.|thumb]]This process is called abiogenesis. If you wait another 3.5 billion years, the process becomes even more complex, and results in multicellular organisms, like us. Whilst the traditional stepped classification (see '''Figure 1''') is useful to scientists, as it makes digestible chunks to interpret | [[File:Inorganic life.jpg|center|700x700px|alt=Biomolecular pathway|'''Figure 2'''. From the simplest inorganic to the more complex organic.|thumb]]This process is called abiogenesis. If you wait another 3.5 billion years, the process becomes even more complex, and results in multicellular organisms, like us. Whilst the traditional stepped classification (see '''Figure 1''') is useful to scientists, as it makes digestible chunks to interpret, in the real world the process is much more fluid<ref>'''Taxonomic boundary paradox''' as described by: Taxonomy versus evolution: János Podani Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Biological Institute, Eötvös University, Pázmány P. s. 1/c, 1117 Budapest, Hungary. TA XON 58 (4) • Published November 2009: 1049–1053. Accessed on 3 July 2022 via: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tax.584001 </ref>. Similar to the roots of a tree branching out, although many stems are produced it is still the same ''super'' organism travelling through time, as shown below. | ||
[[File:Step to flow.png|alt=Step to flow|center|700x700px|thumb|'''Figure 3'''. The superorganism.]] | [[File:Step to flow.png|alt=Step to flow|center|700x700px|thumb|'''Figure 3'''. The superorganism.]] | ||
Revision as of 08:55, 13 July 2022
We are all more closely related than you may think.
Historically, the development of life has been portrayed in stages (Figure 1). Life started as the Root and through evolution came into being us, the most complex forms of life on the planet. But this leaves a question, where did the root come from?
Life is thought to have started from simple inorganic molecules (Figure 2) [1][2] which interacted to make other molecules which eventually could replicate themselves. Imagine, the simplest thing that can replicate itself, however, every billion replications an error occurs making a new type of replicant which then over time repeats this process. Add a dash of selection of the best replicants by evolution and a billion years later you get life...
This process is called abiogenesis. If you wait another 3.5 billion years, the process becomes even more complex, and results in multicellular organisms, like us. Whilst the traditional stepped classification (see Figure 1) is useful to scientists, as it makes digestible chunks to interpret, in the real world the process is much more fluid[3]. Similar to the roots of a tree branching out, although many stems are produced it is still the same super organism travelling through time, as shown below.
We are all more closely related than you think, as all life, in short, is us travelling through time!
Further reading
- The Selfish Gene - Dawkins, Richard, 1941. Oxford ; New York :Oxford University Press, 1989. ISBN: 978-0198788607
References
- ↑ Evidence for early life in Earth's oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates. Dodd, Matthew S.; Papineau, Dominic; Grenne, Tor; Slack, John F.; Rittner, Martin; Pirajno, Franco; O'Neil, Jonathan; Little, Crispin T.S. (1 March 2017). . Nature. 543 (7643): 60–64. Bibcode:2017Natur.543...60D. doi:10.1038/nature21377. PMID 28252057. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2017 via https://www.nature.com/articles/nature21377?source=post_page---------------------------.
- ↑ Crucial steps to life: From chemical reactions to code using agents. BioSystems. 140: 49–57. Witzany, Guenther (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.12.007. PMID 26723230. Accessed via: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0303264715002063
- ↑ Taxonomic boundary paradox as described by: Taxonomy versus evolution: János Podani Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Biological Institute, Eötvös University, Pázmány P. s. 1/c, 1117 Budapest, Hungary. TA XON 58 (4) • Published November 2009: 1049–1053. Accessed on 3 July 2022 via: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tax.584001