We: Difference between revisions
From BurnZero
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Phylogenetic.png|frameless|332x332px|The tree of life.|alt=Phylogenetic Tree|border|right]]'''We are all more closely related than you think.''' The traditional way to view how life developed on earth was in stages (as you can see to the right). The tree illustrates how all life was once one thing (on the left) and progresses into being us, the most complex form of life on the planet.<ref>https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/not_my_circus,_not_my_monkeys#:~:text=(colloquial)%20It's%20none%20of%20my,a%20volatile%20or%20delicate%20situation.</ref> | [[File:Phylogenetic.png|frameless|332x332px|The tree of life.|alt=Phylogenetic Tree|border|right]]'''We are all more closely related than you think.''' The traditional way to view how life developed on earth was in stages (as you can see to the right). The tree illustrates how all life was once one thing (on the left) and progresses into being us, the most complex form of life on the planet.<ref>https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/not_my_circus,_not_my_monkeys#:~:text=(colloquial)%20It's%20none%20of%20my,a%20volatile%20or%20delicate%20situation.</ref> | ||
But the '''''root''''' has always posed a philosophical problem.''Where did it come from?'' | But the '''''root''''' has always posed a philosophical problem.''Where did it come from?'' ''What came first the chicken or the egg?'' It is thought life started from simple inorganic molecules<ref>Dodd, Matthew S.; Papineau, Dominic; Grenne, Tor; Slack, John F.; Rittner, Martin; Pirajno, Franco; O'Neil, Jonathan; Little, Crispin T.S. (1 March 2017). "Evidence for early life in Earth's oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates". ''Nature''. '''543''' (7643): 60–64. Bibcode:2017Natur.543...60D. doi:10.1038/nature21377. <nowiki>PMID 28252057</nowiki>. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2017.</ref><ref>Witzany, Guenther (2016). "Crucial steps to life: From chemical reactions to code using agents" (PDF). ''BioSystems''. '''140''': 49–57. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.12.007. <nowiki>PMID 26723230</nowiki>.</ref>, which interacted to make other molecules which could replicate themselves. Imagine, the simplest thing that can replicate itself, however every billion replications an error occurs making a new type of replicant which then over time repeats this process . Add a dash of evolution and a [[Long collective history|billion years]] later you get life... | ||
[[File:Inorganic life.jpg|center|frameless|700x700px|alt=Biomolecular pathway|Biomolecular pathway]]Wait another 3.5 billion years, and it | [[File:Inorganic life.jpg|center|frameless|700x700px|alt=Biomolecular pathway|Biomolecular pathway]]Wait another 3.5 billion years, and it becomes so complex it is us. Whilst the traditional stepped classification is useful to scientists, as it makes digestible chunks, in the real world the process was much more fluid. Similar to the roots of a tree branching out, although many stems are produced it is still the same ''macro'' organism travelling through time, as shown below. | ||
[[File:Step to flow.png|alt=Step to flow|center|700x700px]]'''We are all more closely related than you think as we are simply the structures that result from our replicating material, DNA. Much the same as how html is the code that built this website.''' | [[File:Step to flow.png|alt=Step to flow|center|700x700px]]'''We are all more closely related than you think as we are simply the structures that result from our replicating material, DNA. Much the same as how html is the code that built this website.''' | ||
=== References === | === References === | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 05:06, 2 April 2022
We are all more closely related than you think. The traditional way to view how life developed on earth was in stages (as you can see to the right). The tree illustrates how all life was once one thing (on the left) and progresses into being us, the most complex form of life on the planet.[1]
But the root has always posed a philosophical problem.Where did it come from? What came first the chicken or the egg? It is thought life started from simple inorganic molecules[2][3], which interacted to make other molecules which could replicate themselves. Imagine, the simplest thing that can replicate itself, however every billion replications an error occurs making a new type of replicant which then over time repeats this process . Add a dash of evolution and a billion years later you get life...
Wait another 3.5 billion years, and it becomes so complex it is us. Whilst the traditional stepped classification is useful to scientists, as it makes digestible chunks, in the real world the process was much more fluid. Similar to the roots of a tree branching out, although many stems are produced it is still the same macro organism travelling through time, as shown below.
We are all more closely related than you think as we are simply the structures that result from our replicating material, DNA. Much the same as how html is the code that built this website.
References
- ↑ https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/not_my_circus,_not_my_monkeys#:~:text=(colloquial)%20It's%20none%20of%20my,a%20volatile%20or%20delicate%20situation.
- ↑ Dodd, Matthew S.; Papineau, Dominic; Grenne, Tor; Slack, John F.; Rittner, Martin; Pirajno, Franco; O'Neil, Jonathan; Little, Crispin T.S. (1 March 2017). "Evidence for early life in Earth's oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates". Nature. 543 (7643): 60–64. Bibcode:2017Natur.543...60D. doi:10.1038/nature21377. PMID 28252057. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2017.
- ↑ Witzany, Guenther (2016). "Crucial steps to life: From chemical reactions to code using agents" (PDF). BioSystems. 140: 49–57. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.12.007. PMID 26723230.