|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| <hr /> | | <hr /> |
|
| |
|
| ''What is good?'' Is good defined by laws in a book or should it be determined on an individual basis? If it comes from a book the law will say that stealing is bad, however what if a parent were to steal food for a starving child? Is that bad? Seems a little grey! Welcome to the concept of [[relativity of ethics]] where a terrorist can be also seen as a freedom fighter. When you consider [[framing]], not much can be deemed universally good or bad as we are all individuals in our own circumstance. However there is one thing we all have in common, the earth, our home. What ''is'' good, is the common protection of our only finite planet. However, wars still rage whilst our planet burns.
| | We are in an [[Ecological crisis|ecological crisis,]] however as a society our response is not proportionate to the threat we all face. Instead of [[greenwashing]], we should be on a war footing to stop our collective bad habits. We urgently need to build the [[Transparency|transparent]] organisations and renewable technologies we need to make living on this planet sustainable. However, we are stuck in a quagmire of [[cognitive biases]] and [[popular delusions]]. <hr/> |
| | |
| Logically, we should be on a war footing stopping the bad habits and building the [[Transparency|transparent]] organisations and renewable technologies we need. However, [[cognitive biases]] and [[popular delusions]] persist. The only way that is known to break out of these restraints in time are to induce [[Pivotal Mental States|pivotal mental states]] (PIM), however as we cannot readily induce a [[Near Death Experience|near death experience]], or launch into space the easiest way to achieve a PIM is via [[psychedelics]]. These much maligned medicines are now being decriminalised globally. <hr/>
| |
| </div> | | </div> |
|
| |
|