Bad science: Difference between revisions

From BurnZero
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Hierarchy of Sciences.png|alt=Hierarchy of Sciences|thumb|Figure 1. Hierarchy of Sciences]]
[[File:Hierarchy of Sciences.png|alt=Hierarchy of Sciences|thumb|Figure 1. Hierarchy of Sciences]]
'''If something is said to be ''science'' or ''news'' does not automatically make it fact. Data is the raw form of information, as [[Cognitive biases|we are not so smart]], we rely on those smarter than us to interpret the data and present us with digestible facts. This third party usually takes the form of knowledgeable experts working within [[Corporation|corporations]] to relay this information. However, the third party as it requires funds often biases the information.'''
'''If something is said to be ''science'' or ''news'' it does not automatically make it fact. Data is the raw form of information but as there is so much of it it's not palatable for us to digest. So we rely on those smarter than us to interpret the data and present us with digestible facts. This third party usually takes the form of knowledgeable experts working within [[Corporation|corporations]] to relay this information. However, the third party as it requires funds often biases the information.'''


The sciences at the top of the hierarchy (see figure 1) such as physics are based on the mechanisms of the universe mathematics, the further down the hierarchy the more complex, multifaceted it becomes.  
The sciences at the top of the hierarchy (see figure 1) such as physics are based on the mechanisms of the universe mathematics, the further down the hierarchy the more complex, multifaceted it becomes.  


For instance a mathematical proof of the Higgs Boson is provable by mathematics, whereas in social sciences because their are so many interlaced factors its more difficult to get to the absolute root casuse.
For instance a mathematical proof of the Higgs Boson is provable by mathematics, whereas in social sciences because their are so many interlaced factors its more difficult to get to the absolute root casuse.

Revision as of 09:27, 27 May 2022

Hierarchy of Sciences
Figure 1. Hierarchy of Sciences

If something is said to be science or news it does not automatically make it fact. Data is the raw form of information but as there is so much of it it's not palatable for us to digest. So we rely on those smarter than us to interpret the data and present us with digestible facts. This third party usually takes the form of knowledgeable experts working within corporations to relay this information. However, the third party as it requires funds often biases the information.

The sciences at the top of the hierarchy (see figure 1) such as physics are based on the mechanisms of the universe mathematics, the further down the hierarchy the more complex, multifaceted it becomes.

For instance a mathematical proof of the Higgs Boson is provable by mathematics, whereas in social sciences because their are so many interlaced factors its more difficult to get to the absolute root casuse.

Share your opinion