Jevons Paradox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Jevons paradox.jpg|alt=More efficiency = more consumption.|thumb|More efficiency = more consumption.]] | [[File:Jevons paradox.jpg|alt=More efficiency = more consumption.|thumb|More efficiency = more consumption.]] | ||
'''Jevons paradox is when a more efficient way of consuming something leads to its increase in demand<ref>Bauer, Diana; Papp, Kathryn (March 18, 2009). "Book Review Perspectives: The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements". ''Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy''. '''5''' (1). doi:10.1080/15487733.2009.11908028.</ref>. For instance, fuel efficiency gains tend to increase not decrease fuel use. In regards to electric vehicles, as they are more efficient they will lead to more energy being used, if this energy in the meantime is being generated from the burning of fossil fuels it will lead to increase missions. This seemingly paradoxical mechanism, runs contrary to the assumption that efficiency gains will lower resource consumption<ref>Alcott, Blake (July 2005). "Jevons' paradox". ''Ecological Economics''. '''54''' (1): 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020. hdl:1942/22574.</ref>.''' | '''Jevons paradox is when a more efficient way of consuming something leads to its increase in demand<ref>Bauer, Diana; Papp, Kathryn (March 18, 2009). "Book Review Perspectives: The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements". ''Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy''. '''5''' (1). doi:10.1080/15487733.2009.11908028.</ref>. For instance, fuel efficiency gains tend to increase not decrease fuel use. In regards to [[Electric Vehicles|electric vehicles]], as they are more efficient they will lead to more energy being used, if this energy in the meantime is being generated from the burning of fossil fuels it will lead to increase missions. This seemingly paradoxical mechanism, runs contrary to the assumption that efficiency gains will lower resource consumption<ref>Alcott, Blake (July 2005). "Jevons' paradox". ''Ecological Economics''. '''54''' (1): 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020. hdl:1942/22574.</ref>.''' | ||
In 1865, the English economist William Stanley Jevons observed that technological improvements that increased the efficiency of coal-use led to the increased consumption of coal in a wide range of industries. He argued that, contrary to common intuition, technological progress could not be relied upon to reduce fuel consumption<ref>Jevons, William Stanley (1866). "VII". ''The Coal Question'' (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan and Company. OCLC 464772008. Retrieved 2008-07-21.</ref>. | In 1865, the English economist William Stanley Jevons observed that technological improvements that increased the efficiency of coal-use led to the increased consumption of coal in a wide range of industries. He argued that, contrary to common intuition, technological progress could not be relied upon to reduce fuel consumption<ref>Jevons, William Stanley (1866). "VII". ''The Coal Question'' (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan and Company. OCLC 464772008. Retrieved 2008-07-21.</ref>. | ||
Revision as of 11:31, 3 March 2022
Jevons paradox is when a more efficient way of consuming something leads to its increase in demand[1]. For instance, fuel efficiency gains tend to increase not decrease fuel use. In regards to electric vehicles, as they are more efficient they will lead to more energy being used, if this energy in the meantime is being generated from the burning of fossil fuels it will lead to increase missions. This seemingly paradoxical mechanism, runs contrary to the assumption that efficiency gains will lower resource consumption[2].
In 1865, the English economist William Stanley Jevons observed that technological improvements that increased the efficiency of coal-use led to the increased consumption of coal in a wide range of industries. He argued that, contrary to common intuition, technological progress could not be relied upon to reduce fuel consumption[3].
The issue has been re-examined by modern economists studying consumption rebound effects from improved energy efficiency. In addition to reducing the amount needed for a given use, improved efficiency also lowers the relative cost of using a resource, which increases the quantity demanded. This counteracts (to some extent) the reduction in use from improved efficiency. Additionally, improved efficiency increases real incomes and accelerates economic growth, further increasing the demand for resources. The Jevons paradox occurs when the effect from increased demand predominates, and improved efficiency increases the speed at which resources are used.[4]
References
- ↑ Bauer, Diana; Papp, Kathryn (March 18, 2009). "Book Review Perspectives: The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements". Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy. 5 (1). doi:10.1080/15487733.2009.11908028.
- ↑ Alcott, Blake (July 2005). "Jevons' paradox". Ecological Economics. 54 (1): 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020. hdl:1942/22574.
- ↑ Jevons, William Stanley (1866). "VII". The Coal Question (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan and Company. OCLC 464772008. Retrieved 2008-07-21.
- ↑ Alcott, Blake (2008). "Historical Overview of the Jevons paradox in the Literature". In JM Polimeni; K Mayumi; M Giampietro (eds.). The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements. Earthscan. pp. 7–78. ISBN 978-1-84407-462-4.