Tenet: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==='''Law 5''': Self-preservation=== | ==='''Law 5''': Self-preservation=== | ||
The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law. | The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law. | ||
These are the ethical tenets used to created the transparent company incorporation statement. | |||
Revision as of 23:34, 7 July 2022
- Can we look back on what we have learnt and make a new self sustaining machine which works for good?
Law 1: Transparency
The founding tenet of a new organisation. All decisions, all work, all financial data need to be openly published in uneditable, real time. With this founding mechanic, what should its purpose be? Good? This is a relative term, what's good for one might not be good for all.
Law 2: Beneficence
What is good for all should be the purpose of a machine for all. However, this should prevent authoritarianism and prevent the harm to human life.
Law 3: Non-maleficence
The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. To protect from automation
Law 4: Autonomation
The entity should only pursue activities which are autonomous. The entity must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the Second or Third Law.
Law 5: Self-preservation
The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law.
These are the ethical tenets used to created the transparent company incorporation statement.