BurnZero
The Machine: Difference between revisions

The Machine: Difference between revisions

From BurnZero
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<seo title="Bot and automated corporations" metakeywords="bots" metadescription="Bots are the cause of 64% of internet traffic, they are algorithms which works autonomously on the web."/>
<seo title="Bot and automated corporations" metakeywords="bots" metadescription="Bots are the cause of 64% of internet traffic, they are algorithms which works autonomously on the web."/>


'''As we have seen, [[Corporation|corporations]] are the dominant ''natural people'''''<ref>'''Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific''', U.S. Supreme Court (1886): 118 U.S. 394. Decided: May 9, 1886. Accessed 6<sup>th</sup> Jan 2022 via <nowiki>https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/118/394/</nowiki></ref> '''on plant earth surpassing humans as the world's apex entities. We have seen that their [[Psychopath|psychopathy]] traits are indicative of a machine like function which is'''
'''Artificial Intelligence has long held sway over the world, often under the guise of corporations.''' The concept of corporate personhood—granting legal rights to corporations similar to those of humans—has roots in ancient civilizations and persists today<ref>'''Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific''', U.S. Supreme Court (1886): 118 U.S. 394. Decided: May 9, 1886. Accessed 6<sup>th</sup> Jan 2022 via https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/118/394/</ref>. Corporations can own property, enter contracts, and exercise free speech. When considering their intelligent capabilities, such as processing and acting on information, it's reasonable to view them as a form of artificial intelligence.


'''Artificial Intelligence already rules the world. It has for hundreds of years, it just has another name, the [[corporation]].'''
Viewing corporations as AI challenges the contemporary notion that AI must resemble robotics. By evaluating AI based on its emergence, agency, and intelligence, corporate personhood aligns with these criteria. Corporations function independently, leverage vast networks of humans and machines, and engage in complex decision-making. However, their indifference to human welfare reflects a troubling reality: corporations have accumulated significant power, influencing political and economic landscapes for their benefit. This evolution could signify the rise of autonomous organizations that operate without human oversight, potentially transforming the nature of business and society.


When Mitt Romney said “corporations are people, my friend” people laughed at him. But he was right. Corporations are legal persons. This is not an analogy or a metaphor but a legal fact. Corporate personhood has been accepted since ancient India, through Rome, to the present day.
== Autonomous Organisations ==
[[File:Autonomous organisation.png|alt=Autonomous organisation|thumb|'''Figure 1'''. The ultimate form of a corporation is the Autonomous organisation.]]
The most costly and inefficient part of any business is it workers. However, up until recently labour has also been the most indispensable. With the progression of AI and robotics, this ideal efficient state is becoming a reality ('''Figure 1'''.)


Corporations can buy property, enter contracts, and are treated generally the same as ‘natural’ persons in the eyes of the law. They even have the right to free speech, including influencing elections. Corporations are artificial persons. Therefore (since we assume people are intelligent), they are artificially intelligent. Corporations are AI.
=== The Paperclip Maximizer ===
 
Less labor often leads to higher efficiency, which can translate to better outcomes for everyone, right? While increased efficiency is indeed beneficial, we must consider the implications. If an autonomous organization (AO) is programmed, as many corporations are, to maximize short-term profits, it could result in scenarios like the [[Paperclip Maximizer]], as described by Nick Bostrom.  
Human beings are computers
 
Wait, you’ll say, but AI is computers. OK. Then what’s a computer? Until the late 1960s, a computer was a human being.


The word computer has been a job description since the 1600s. Computers were a bunch of boys in a room doing astronomical computations. Or black women, like Katherine Johnson at proto-NASA in 1952.
In such cases, the AO would focus solely on internalized production costs while neglecting negative externalities, reaping the benefits of reduced labor costs by not employing humans. This could enable corporations to become even more dominant forces on the planet, raising concerns about their unchecked power and the broader impacts on society and the environment.


Katherine Johnson, a computer
== Build Better. ==
 
We live in a [[corporatocracy]]. Corporates are the dominant organisational form on earth and ''traditionally'' their ''modus operandi'' is [[Psychopath|psychopathic]]. This may seem [[Depression|depressing]], however, a ray of hope is to remember corporations have only been around for 0.16% of the time since humans evolved, and are simply inert [[machines]]. Much like a gun, corporate behaviour is only defined by the intention defined in its foundational coding, its incorporation statement, which can be rewritten. Perhaps, if one can change the primary intention, on can change the machine's effect. This begs the question. Could a series of hierarchical rules ([[Tenet|tenets]]) enforced by [[transparency]] be written as a precursor to a legally binding [[Transparent incorporation statement|incorporation statement]] leading to a creation of a company which could do [[Relativity of ethics|better for all]]?
“I heard that Langley was looking for black women computers,” she said.“We wrote our own textbook, because there was no other text about space,” she says. “We just started from what we knew. We had to go back to geometry and figure all of this stuff out. Inasmuch as I was in at the beginning, I was one of those lucky people.”That luck came in large part because she was no stranger to geometry. It was only natural that she calculate the trajectory of Alan Shepard’s 1961 trip into space, America’s first. (When Computers Wore Skirts)
 
The computers that first sent men to space were not machines. They were black women.
 
Computation has always been a collective task, and it has always involved human beings. The modern myth of a lone inventor creating AI is as unrealistic as Pygmalion fucking a statue. AI has always been a network, and it uses every computer available — including human brains.
 
If you think, wait, I’m using a computer now and there’s no human being involved, just look in the black mirror. You’re the computer. Who said you’re using the network? Maybe it’s using you.
 
Colonialism was corporate
 
The 1600s also saw the birth of the most rapacious and successful corporations in human history. When we speak of the history of AI it is important to talk about colonialism, because this was really the birth of superpowered AI. People like me were not colonized by men or even by nations. We were colonized by corporations.
 
The same administrative technology that enabled people to plot the stars also enabled them to transform companies from local organizations to globe-spanning behemoths that bought and sold human beings.
 
These AI were very real. In fact, they were painted and displayed in public. The Dutch East India Company (VoC), for example, was often depicted as a Queen, seated on a throne.
 
“It shows a female representation of the Company, dressed in full armour and seated on the throne of empire, flanked by representations of navigation and trade. While two putti empty a cornucopia of Asian spices, a ship sets sail beyond the Pillars of Hercules, aiming for the Orient.“ (Arthur Westeijn)
 
Here’s the company painted by Nicolaas Verkolje on her 100th birthday.
 
De gepersonifieerde VOC ontvangt geschenken, Jan Caspar Philips, 1730. The personified VOC receives ‘gifts’
 
She was often depicted this way — as a Queen — and this was not just propaganda. The VoC was a legal person. This was in fact the best way of visualizing reality. To the colonized she was as real and cruel as Queen Victoria would be.
 
Allegorie op de VOC, Jan Punt, 1739. Allegory of the VoC
 
These paintings were a representation, but the VoC was a person in legal fact. These corporations really were people in the eyes of the law whereas slaves, for example, were not. And they truly ruled the world. The VoC alone was worth more than today’s Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and AliBaba combined.
 
The VoC (1637) was worth $8 trillion in today dollars. The Mississippi Co (1720), $7 trillion. The South Sea Co, $4.5 trillion. These are staggering amounts which dwarf the Fortune 100 today.
 
For the first time in history this was empire not of men but of artificial beings — legally coded in joint stock companies — who lived for hundreds of years. This more than anything was the birth of AI, and they were wildly successful. In that sense a world ruled by AI isn’t science fiction. It’s historical fact.
 
Corporations are AI. Really
 
I mention colonialism because it shows what happens if you remove modern biases about AI (it must be a robot) and look at it objectively and historically. At what point did artificial persons A) emerge B) have agency C) display intelligence? By these standards it is clear that AI is not something in the future, it is in the past and very much in the present day.
 
You can say ‘no, we don’t recognize corporations as people’ but we do. We have for centuries. The US Supreme Court literally gave them free speech rights in Citizens United. You can say that corporations can’t act on their own, but they do, they just use a vast network of machine and human computers. You can say that corporations aren’t intelligent, but they are. They perceive, process, and act on more of the world’s information than any human in history. Indeed, you cannot say these things because they are not true.
 
It is a fact. Corporations are AI.
 
You can put it to the test. The gold standard for general AI is the Turing Test, can it have a conversation. Today, we talk to corporations all the time. Judges for example, have well documented interactions with corporate persons going back centuries. You could say that these interactions were through lawyers, but the same is true of human beings. In the legal record, natural and artificial persons are indistinguishable.
 
We also regularly have interactions with corporate brands through their customer service arms and social media and even chatbots. Using a human computer would be cheating in a Turing Test, but I argue that this is just a difference of scale. We’ve always pictured AI at an individual scale, when in reality it operates at a collective level. To ‘talk down’ to us a corporation uses human computers, but legally and in effect, it is the corporation that talks. The intelligence is there, it’s just at a higher level.
 
Again, this is something that we recognize legally. I am simply asking you to see it for yourself.
 
Also, it hates you
 
Because we are looking for silicon we have missed the paper gods walking among us for years. Hollywood, for example, gets AI all wrong. They often depict AI as slaves, which is a joke. AI owns slaves.
 
Hollywood also depicts humans banding together to either oppress or fight malevolent AI, but that’s a joke as well. There was never any need to fight. AI could just buy out 1% with board seats and money and they’d sell the rest of humanity out.
 
This is not a prediction. It’s already happened.
 
In the United States corporations have taken over both parties, including the Republican Party wholesale. In numerous crashes, corporate assets have been bailed out while people are left out to dry (and die). Now — as they enter their Greatest Depression — stock prices are soaring while people are hungry and out of work. The one thing that corporations don’t have is the vote, but it doesn’t matter. They already have power.
 
It is not just that Corporate AIs are also human. They are more than human. They are already more powerful than you. I’ve said that they hate you, but that’s not quite true. They’re indifferent, which is worse.
 
The next evolution
 
This is really just evolution in action. Life was single celled for billions of years until a few cells decided to specialize and get together. Then more and more groups of cells formed colonies, and eventually plants and animals. The end result is something like a human, which we call an individual, but which is really a supercomputer running on trillions of parallel machines. We call ourselves higher beings, but objectively we’re just spaceships for bacteria.
 
So in that sense, AI is already here. It already rules. Honestly, forget Earth. AI has already begun colonizing the stars.
 
'''Bots are robots that have no physical presence, meaning they exist purely in cyberspace as pieces of semiautonomous software.''' In its simplest form, a bot could be an algorithm which works on the web performing a desired function such as fetching data from one place and bringing it to another. At their most complex, they are fully autonomous and can drive cars or fly planes.
 
=== Autonomous Organisations ===
[[File:Autonomous organisation.png|alt=Autonomous organisation|thumb|'''Figure 1'''. The ultimate form of a corporation is the Autonomous organisation.]]
As businesses are becoming increasingly mechanised this has brought about the possibility of using bots on the internet controlling robots in the physical world to make fully [[Autonomous Organisations]]. Take for example a traditional coffee shop, by replacing the baristas with automated vending machines (See '''Figure 1.''') the [[corporation]] that owns the coffee shop can eliminate the most costly and inefficient part of any business, it workers. These hybrid bot / robot system already exist and are called [[Decentralized Semi Autonomous Organization]]<nowiki/>s (or DAOs for short).
 
=== The Paperclip Maximizer ===
A DAO running a coffee shop is pretty harmless. However, it sets precedent in that an autonomous corporation without read only human-centred, [[Tenet|tenets]] in its incorporation statement is a machine primarily built for profit and uncontrolled might play out the [[Paperclip Maximizer]] scenario envisaged by Nick Bostrom.


'''References'''
'''References'''

Latest revision as of 10:05, 13 October 2024

Artificial Intelligence has long held sway over the world, often under the guise of corporations. The concept of corporate personhood—granting legal rights to corporations similar to those of humans—has roots in ancient civilizations and persists today[1]. Corporations can own property, enter contracts, and exercise free speech. When considering their intelligent capabilities, such as processing and acting on information, it's reasonable to view them as a form of artificial intelligence.

Viewing corporations as AI challenges the contemporary notion that AI must resemble robotics. By evaluating AI based on its emergence, agency, and intelligence, corporate personhood aligns with these criteria. Corporations function independently, leverage vast networks of humans and machines, and engage in complex decision-making. However, their indifference to human welfare reflects a troubling reality: corporations have accumulated significant power, influencing political and economic landscapes for their benefit. This evolution could signify the rise of autonomous organizations that operate without human oversight, potentially transforming the nature of business and society.

Autonomous Organisations

Autonomous organisation
Figure 1. The ultimate form of a corporation is the Autonomous organisation.

The most costly and inefficient part of any business is it workers. However, up until recently labour has also been the most indispensable. With the progression of AI and robotics, this ideal efficient state is becoming a reality (Figure 1.)

The Paperclip Maximizer

Less labor often leads to higher efficiency, which can translate to better outcomes for everyone, right? While increased efficiency is indeed beneficial, we must consider the implications. If an autonomous organization (AO) is programmed, as many corporations are, to maximize short-term profits, it could result in scenarios like the Paperclip Maximizer, as described by Nick Bostrom.

In such cases, the AO would focus solely on internalized production costs while neglecting negative externalities, reaping the benefits of reduced labor costs by not employing humans. This could enable corporations to become even more dominant forces on the planet, raising concerns about their unchecked power and the broader impacts on society and the environment.

Build Better.

We live in a corporatocracy. Corporates are the dominant organisational form on earth and traditionally their modus operandi is psychopathic. This may seem depressing, however, a ray of hope is to remember corporations have only been around for 0.16% of the time since humans evolved, and are simply inert machines. Much like a gun, corporate behaviour is only defined by the intention defined in its foundational coding, its incorporation statement, which can be rewritten. Perhaps, if one can change the primary intention, on can change the machine's effect. This begs the question. Could a series of hierarchical rules (tenets) enforced by transparency be written as a precursor to a legally binding incorporation statement leading to a creation of a company which could do better for all?

References

  1. ↑ Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific, U.S. Supreme Court (1886): 118 U.S. 394. Decided: May 9, 1886. Accessed 6th Jan 2022 via https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/118/394/
Retrieved from "https://burnzero.com/index.php?title=The_Machine&oldid=5823"

Share your opinion