|
|
| (38 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[File:Corporate etymology.png|alt=Corporate etymology|thumb|The origin of the word "Corporation"]] | | [[File:Machine-cog.jpg|alt=A poem about cogs in a machine.|thumb|Figure 1. A poem about cogs in a machine.]] |
| '''A machine is a collection of enclosed parts that exert force on each other to produce a desired function. This may be as simple as cogs in a drill press making holes or employees working in a [[corporation]] to make a profit.''' | | '''A machine is a collection of parts that uses energy to produce output. This may be as simple as cogs in a drill press making holes in wood or employees working in a [[corporation]] to make profit.''' |
|
| |
|
| It is the commonality of the parts which define the machine i.e. the majority of parts in a drill press do simple tasks which work together to make holes in things. Whereas in a corporation a collection of people work together to make profit. Machines always have inputs, a function and then based on their efficiency, a productive output (''internality'') and a waste output (''[[Externalities|externality]]'').
| | As automation increases with the rise of [[Bots|robotisation]], deunionisation and digital internal governance systems, corporate machines are becoming less human and more mechanised in their pursuit of output. |
|
| |
|
| == Machine Intelligence ==
| | Machines often have a purpose, where a drill press in a factory makes holes, a corporation as per their incorporation statement has a [[Fiduciary Duty|fiduciary duty]] to make money for shareholder profit or wages. Since the [[ecological crisis]], we’ve been told that the machine can change. Benevolent investors would simply reroute capital away from dirty energy sectors and toward the green industries of the future. But the promise of “''socially responsible finance''” has proven to be illusory [[greenwashing]]. For instance, despite pledges to do otherwise, Blackrock, the world’s largest asset manager, has continued to invest in fossil fuel companies, and the production of coal—the dirtiest fossil fuel—is now on the rise. |
| Hawkings<ref>https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/science/stephen-hawking-warned-artificial-intelligence-could-end-human-race/articleshow/63297552.cms?from=mdr</ref>, Musk<ref>https://www.documentjournal.com/2018/04/the-existential-paranoia-fueling-elon-musks-fear-of-ai/</ref>, Gates<ref>https://www.bbc.com/news/31047780</ref>, have all stated their fear of the potential existential threats we face with the development of AI. There are multiple reasons however it boils down to if you create something more intelligent than yourself it may find out some information which we do not know which might rationalise destroying human life. For instance, if an AI was tasked without '''hard written (ROM)''' specifying something along the lines of Issac Asimov's three laws of robotics to protect biodiverse life on earth its first thought would most probably kill the majority of humans. Luckily, as of yet no autonomous robots have been created in the traditional sense.
| |
|
| |
|
| There are many problems with the creation of General AI, and many of them have been solved for instance human intelligence has been mimicked as a starting point, spawning neural networks and machine learning technology which has taught us that weighting masses of data points in an interlaced network of tables helps computers come up with better solutions to problems. However, as of yet, it seems not to have been able to unhook from coded heuristics to make its own about the world. | | There is no-one to blame here. It is not an evil genius pulling the strings in order to destroy the planet. It is simply a machine whose primary purpose is making money irrelevant of negative [[externalities]]. |
| | |
| Noimosynthesis argues that corporations are an amalgamation of legal heuristics which has enabled the creation of state recognised entities which will prove to be the starting point of new AI systems. They already exist and since the creation of computers have been advancing through a singularity to become autonomous beings similar to DAOs.
| |
| [[File:Singularity.png|alt=Singularity|thumb|Singularity]]
| |
| ''The machines we fear are already here'', means many share the same existential dread of super intelligent machines being our overlord. Machine theory argues the seeds of them already walk amongst us. The weakest part of these machines currently are the people, unionisation and strikes historically have been effective in jamming the machines progress, however with the further developments in robotics and self governing quality management systems means a cybernetic system is nearly upon us. We have a limited time now as humans still have power to clog the machines progress into something autonomously run in the pursuit of profit. Unfortunately, the longer we do not take action, the quicker the process becomes.
| |
| | |
| This is occuring not because of villainous masterminds concocting an evil plan for world domination, it is an emergent phenomenon of the information age. Where as life is an [[We|emergent function of the universe]], so too are machines in the information age. In abiogenesis, started with the primordial soup of binary housed in a computer and now has grown into the various cybernetic systems which regulate our economy.
| |
| | |
| '''References'''
| |
Figure 1. A poem about cogs in a machine.
A machine is a collection of parts that uses energy to produce output. This may be as simple as cogs in a drill press making holes in wood or employees working in a corporation to make profit.
As automation increases with the rise of robotisation, deunionisation and digital internal governance systems, corporate machines are becoming less human and more mechanised in their pursuit of output.
Machines often have a purpose, where a drill press in a factory makes holes, a corporation as per their incorporation statement has a fiduciary duty to make money for shareholder profit or wages. Since the ecological crisis, we’ve been told that the machine can change. Benevolent investors would simply reroute capital away from dirty energy sectors and toward the green industries of the future. But the promise of “socially responsible finance” has proven to be illusory greenwashing. For instance, despite pledges to do otherwise, Blackrock, the world’s largest asset manager, has continued to invest in fossil fuel companies, and the production of coal—the dirtiest fossil fuel—is now on the rise.
There is no-one to blame here. It is not an evil genius pulling the strings in order to destroy the planet. It is simply a machine whose primary purpose is making money irrelevant of negative externalities.
