State capture: Difference between revisions

From BurnZero
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:The metaphor of a revolving door has been used to describe people switching jobs, from working as lawmakers, to being lobbyists, and vice versa..jpg|alt=State capture|thumb|The metaphor of a ''revolving door'' has been used to describe people switching jobs, from working as lawmakers, to being lobbyists, and vice versa.]]
[[File:The metaphor of a revolving door has been used to describe people switching jobs, from working as lawmakers, to being lobbyists, and vice versa..jpg|alt=State capture|thumb|The metaphor of a ''revolving door'' has been used to describe people switching jobs, from working as lawmakers, to being lobbyists, and vice versa.]]
A result of revolving door politics where people who work within corporates that dominate specific industries often end up working in government.
'''State capture is a type of systemic political corruption in which private interests significantly influence a state's decision-making processes to their own advantage.'''
 
It is often a result of lobbying and revolving door politics where people who work within corporates that dominate specific industries often end up working in government. Often the larger industries hold more power over governments than the smaller ones<ref>https://australiandemocracy.org.au/statecapture</ref>.

Latest revision as of 04:31, 19 February 2022

State capture
The metaphor of a revolving door has been used to describe people switching jobs, from working as lawmakers, to being lobbyists, and vice versa.

State capture is a type of systemic political corruption in which private interests significantly influence a state's decision-making processes to their own advantage.

It is often a result of lobbying and revolving door politics where people who work within corporates that dominate specific industries often end up working in government. Often the larger industries hold more power over governments than the smaller ones[1].

Share your opinion