Tenet: Difference between revisions

From BurnZero
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(49 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Can we look back on what we have learnt and make a new self sustaining [[Machines|machine]] which works for [[Relativity of ethics|good]]?'''
'''A tenet is a permanent ethical ''rule'' used in a hierarchical series in the [[Transparent incorporation statement|incorporation statement]] of [[The Transparent Company]]. These rules, unlike Google's recently removed statement in their code of conduct "Don't be evil"''' <ref>'''Google quietly removes ‘don’t be evil’ preface from code of conduct'''. The Independent Newspaper UK - Anthony Cuthbertson, published on Monday 21 May 2018. Accessed on 29th Sept 2022 via: https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/google-dont-be-evil-code-conduct-removed-alphabet-a8361276.html</ref> '''are unremovable and act like Read Only Memory (ROM) in a computer.''' They are utilised to ensure that the company, for the entirety of its existence is focused on ethical acts.


What would these heuristics look like?
=='''Law 1''': [https://burnzero.com/Transparency Transparency]==
The workings of the organisation are 100% [[Transparency|transparent]]. All generated data is to be automatically openly published in real time, decentralised, uneditable format.
=='''Law 2''': Beneficence==
The organisation shall do [[Relativity of ethics|good]] for all and strive to be a negative [[Externalities|externality]] sink.
=='''Law 3''': Non-maleficence==
The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
=='''Law 4''': Autonomation==
The entity should only pursue activities which are fully or as near to autonomous as possible.
=='''Law 5''': Self-preservation==
The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law. If calculated negative externalities exceed positive externalities, the company must stop operation.
=='''Law 6''': Governance==
As 100% autonomy cannot yet be achieved a controller and a board needs to be elected as to make specific decisions. A governance system of anonymous whistleblowing should be in place so that either the public, customers or board can anonymously highlight specific activity. If the activity is then investigated by the board and it is found one of the controllers or board members to be at fault of the Law they will be ejected from the group.


# '''First Law''' - the company is [[Externalities|For Externality Minimisation]]
These tenets are intended to be used to created the [[Transparent incorporation statement|incorporation statement of the first transparent company]].
# '''Second Law''' - the corporation may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
# '''Third Law''' - the corporation must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
# '''Fourth Law''' - the corporation must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
# '''Fifth Law''' - all action performed by the the corporation must process through a system of based on real time, 100% transparent, non-editable disclosure.


'''The next stage is to us this statement to incorporate into and entity called [[The Parallel]].'''
'''References'''

Latest revision as of 23:05, 5 November 2023

A tenet is a permanent ethical rule used in a hierarchical series in the incorporation statement of The Transparent Company. These rules, unlike Google's recently removed statement in their code of conduct "Don't be evil" [1] are unremovable and act like Read Only Memory (ROM) in a computer. They are utilised to ensure that the company, for the entirety of its existence is focused on ethical acts.

Law 1: Transparency

The workings of the organisation are 100% transparent. All generated data is to be automatically openly published in real time, decentralised, uneditable format.

Law 2: Beneficence

The organisation shall do good for all and strive to be a negative externality sink.

Law 3: Non-maleficence

The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.

Law 4: Autonomation

The entity should only pursue activities which are fully or as near to autonomous as possible.

Law 5: Self-preservation

The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law. If calculated negative externalities exceed positive externalities, the company must stop operation.

Law 6: Governance

As 100% autonomy cannot yet be achieved a controller and a board needs to be elected as to make specific decisions. A governance system of anonymous whistleblowing should be in place so that either the public, customers or board can anonymously highlight specific activity. If the activity is then investigated by the board and it is found one of the controllers or board members to be at fault of the Law they will be ejected from the group.

These tenets are intended to be used to created the incorporation statement of the first transparent company.

References

  1. Google quietly removes ‘don’t be evil’ preface from code of conduct. The Independent Newspaper UK - Anthony Cuthbertson, published on Monday 21 May 2018. Accessed on 29th Sept 2022 via: https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/google-dont-be-evil-code-conduct-removed-alphabet-a8361276.html

Share your opinion