Bad science: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The sciences at the top of the hierarchy (see '''Figure 1''') such as physics are based on the mechanisms of the universe mathematics, the further down the hierarchy the more complex, multifaceted it becomes. | The sciences at the top of the hierarchy (see '''Figure 1''') such as physics are based on the mechanisms of the universe mathematics, the further down the hierarchy the more complex, multifaceted it becomes. | ||
For instance a mathematical proof of the Higgs Boson is provable by mathematics, whereas in social sciences because their are so many interlaced factors | For instance a mathematical proof of the Higgs Boson is provable by mathematics, whereas in social sciences because their are so many interlaced factors it is more difficult to get to the absolute root cause. | ||
Revision as of 00:40, 19 June 2022
If something is said to be science or news it does not automatically make it fact. Data is the raw form of information but as there is so much of it it's not palatable for us to digest. So we rely on those smarter than us to interpret the data and present us with digestible facts. This third party usually takes the form of knowledgeable experts working within corporations to relay this information. However, the third party as it requires funds often biases the information.
The sciences at the top of the hierarchy (see Figure 1) such as physics are based on the mechanisms of the universe mathematics, the further down the hierarchy the more complex, multifaceted it becomes.
For instance a mathematical proof of the Higgs Boson is provable by mathematics, whereas in social sciences because their are so many interlaced factors it is more difficult to get to the absolute root cause.