Tenet: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=='''Law 1''': [https://burnzero.com/Transparency Transparency]== | =='''Law 1''': [https://burnzero.com/Transparency Transparency]== | ||
The | The workings of the organisation are 100% [[Transparency|transparent]]. All machinations are to be openly published in uneditable, real time. | ||
=='''Law 2''': Beneficence== | =='''Law 2''': Beneficence== | ||
The organisation shall do [[Relativity of ethics|good]] for all and strive to be a negative [[Externalities|externality]] sink. | |||
=='''Law 3''': Non-maleficence== | =='''Law 3''': Non-maleficence== | ||
The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. | The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. | ||
Revision as of 01:22, 12 July 2022
A tenet, in this context, is a series of ethical laws created to be used hierarchically to formulate the transparent incorporation statement, with the sole goal of creating a template for a new self sustaining machine which works for good.
Law 1: Transparency
The workings of the organisation are 100% transparent. All machinations are to be openly published in uneditable, real time.
Law 2: Beneficence
The organisation shall do good for all and strive to be a negative externality sink.
Law 3: Non-maleficence
The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
Law 4: Autonomation
The entity should only pursue activities which are as near fully autonomous as possible.
Law 5: Self-preservation
The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law. If calculated negative externalities exceed positive externalities, the company must stop operation.
Law 6: Governance
As 100% autonomy cannot yet be achieved a controller and a board needs to be elected as to make specific decisions. A governance system of anonymous whistleblowing should be in place so that either the public, customers or board can anonymously highlight specific activity. If the activity is then investigated by the board and it is found one of the controllers or board members to be at fault of the Law they will be ejected from the group.