Tenet: Difference between revisions
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. To protect from automation | The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. To protect from automation | ||
=='''Law 4''': Autonomation== | =='''Law 4''': Autonomation== | ||
The entity should only pursue activities which are autonomous | The entity should only pursue activities which are autonomous. | ||
=='''Law 5''': Self-preservation== | =='''Law 5''': Self-preservation== | ||
The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law. If calculated negative externalities exceed positive externalities, the company must stop operation. | The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law. If calculated negative externalities exceed positive externalities, the company must stop operation. | ||
=='''Law 6''': Governance== | =='''Law 6''': Governance== | ||
As 100% autonomy cannot yet be achieved a controller and a board needs to be elected as to make specific decisions. A governance system of anonymous whistleblowing should be in place so that either the public, customers or board can anonymously highlight specific activity. If the activity is then investigated by the board and it is found one of the controllers or board members to be at fault of the Law they will be ejected from the group. | As 100% autonomy cannot yet be achieved a controller and a board needs to be elected as to make specific decisions. A governance system of anonymous whistleblowing should be in place so that either the public, customers or board can anonymously highlight specific activity. If the activity is then investigated by the board and it is found one of the controllers or board members to be at fault of the Law they will be ejected from the group. | ||
Revision as of 01:17, 12 July 2022
A tenet, in this context, is a series of ethical laws created to be used hierarchically to formulate the transparent incorporation statement, with the sole goal of creating a template for a new self sustaining machine which works for good.
Law 1: Transparency
The founding tenet of a new organisation. All decisions, all work, all financial data need to be openly published in uneditable, real time. With this founding mechanic, what should its purpose be? Good? This is a relative term, what's good for one might not be good for all.
Law 2: Beneficence
What is good for all should be the purpose of a machine for all. However, this should prevent authoritarianism and prevent the harm to human life.
Law 3: Non-maleficence
The entity may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm. To protect from automation
Law 4: Autonomation
The entity should only pursue activities which are autonomous.
Law 5: Self-preservation
The entity must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the Second or Third Law. If calculated negative externalities exceed positive externalities, the company must stop operation.
Law 6: Governance
As 100% autonomy cannot yet be achieved a controller and a board needs to be elected as to make specific decisions. A governance system of anonymous whistleblowing should be in place so that either the public, customers or board can anonymously highlight specific activity. If the activity is then investigated by the board and it is found one of the controllers or board members to be at fault of the Law they will be ejected from the group.