Disinformation: Difference between revisions

From BurnZero
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Objective information is often found by looking deep into a subject using science and a microscope. The issue with this is the data points which are collected and published behind paywalls and then interpreted by bias institutions and regurgitated as news. With the advent its a common fallacy but an argument flat earthers always come up with is have you ever seen the world as a sphere? There are  under 1,000 people on earth<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_travelers_by_nationality#:~:text=5%20Notes-,Statistics,according%20to%20the%20American%20definition.</ref> who have done so however the majority of the earth populace believe the earth to be a sphere, so how did they come to this conclusion?
Objective information is often found by looking deep into a subject using science and a microscope. The issue with this is the data points which are collected and published behind paywalls and then interpreted by bias institutions and regurgitated as news. With the advent its a common fallacy but an argument flat earthers always come up with is have you ever seen the world as a sphere? There are  under 1,000 people on earth<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_travelers_by_nationality#:~:text=5%20Notes-,Statistics,according%20to%20the%20American%20definition.</ref> who have done so however the majority of the earth populace believe the earth to be a sphere, so how did they come to this conclusion?


The human mind has evolved [[heuristics]] which allow weighting of information based upon its perceived authority. For instance, story of the BOY who cried wolf, might have ended differently if the protagonist was a middle aged doctor in a lab coat<ref>Chaput de Saintonge DM, Herxheimer A. Harmessing placebo effects in health care. Lancet. 1994;344:995–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]</ref>. We have negative weighting to younger people when exchanging information, it seems the older a person is the more wisdom and weight. This may have made sense during the pre-internet era as information was less dynamic, however today longevity is more of a hinderance than a benefit as it have been found that [[neuroplasticity]] which is of the utmost importance during crisis wanes with age.
The human mind has evolved [[heuristics]] which allow weighting of information based upon its perceived authority. For instance, story of the BOY who cried wolf, might have ended differently if the protagonist was a middle aged doctor in a lab coat<ref>Chaput de Saintonge DM, Herxheimer A. Harmessing placebo effects in health care. Lancet. 1994;344:995–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]</ref>. We have negative weighting to younger people when exchanging information, it seems the older a person is the more wisdom and weight. This may have made sense during the pre-internet era as information was less dynamic, however today longevity is more of a hindrance than a benefit as it have been found that [[neuroplasticity]] which is of the utmost importance during crisis wanes with age.
 
Irregardless of perceived authority, the flat earth conspirist has a point, how do you know information is from a non bias source without being able to check the source yourself. This is where the open information age has become indispensable.
 
== Sci-Hub ==
In short, Aaron Schwartz a co creator of Reddit


'''References'''
'''References'''

Revision as of 06:25, 17 May 2022

Objective information is often found by looking deep into a subject using science and a microscope. The issue with this is the data points which are collected and published behind paywalls and then interpreted by bias institutions and regurgitated as news. With the advent its a common fallacy but an argument flat earthers always come up with is have you ever seen the world as a sphere? There are under 1,000 people on earth[1] who have done so however the majority of the earth populace believe the earth to be a sphere, so how did they come to this conclusion?

The human mind has evolved heuristics which allow weighting of information based upon its perceived authority. For instance, story of the BOY who cried wolf, might have ended differently if the protagonist was a middle aged doctor in a lab coat[2]. We have negative weighting to younger people when exchanging information, it seems the older a person is the more wisdom and weight. This may have made sense during the pre-internet era as information was less dynamic, however today longevity is more of a hindrance than a benefit as it have been found that neuroplasticity which is of the utmost importance during crisis wanes with age.

Irregardless of perceived authority, the flat earth conspirist has a point, how do you know information is from a non bias source without being able to check the source yourself. This is where the open information age has become indispensable.

Sci-Hub

In short, Aaron Schwartz a co creator of Reddit

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_travelers_by_nationality#:~:text=5%20Notes-,Statistics,according%20to%20the%20American%20definition.
  2. Chaput de Saintonge DM, Herxheimer A. Harmessing placebo effects in health care. Lancet. 1994;344:995–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Share your opinion