Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
We stand on the cusp, but we [[Framing|frame]] and [[Gas lighting|gas light]] ourselves to death. | We stand on the cusp, but we [[Framing|frame]] and [[Gas lighting|gas light]] ourselves to death. | ||
We look outwardly for [[Ecomodernism|ecomodern]] solutions listening to [[startup culture]] prophets promising solutions like [[Electric Vehicles|electric vehicles]] but most are confounded by [[Jevons Paradox]] and the fact that 100 corporation cause 71% of industrial emissions<ref>'''Carbon Majors Report''' - Accessed 25<sup>th</sup> January 2022 via<nowiki/>https://climateaccountability.org/carbonmajors.html</ref>. | We look outwardly for [[Ecomodernism|ecomodern]] solutions listening to [[hype cycles]] of [[startup culture]] prophets promising solutions like [[Electric Vehicles|electric vehicles]] but most are confounded by [[Jevons Paradox]] and the fact that 100 corporation cause 71% of industrial emissions<ref>'''Carbon Majors Report''' - Accessed 25<sup>th</sup> January 2022 via<nowiki/>https://climateaccountability.org/carbonmajors.html</ref>. | ||
To solve the issue we need to be mindful of our own [[psychopharmacology]] and out: [[popular delusions]], [[cognitive biases]], [[heuristics]] and [[Psychological fallacies|psychological fallacies.]]To see that we are in a [[climate crisis]] which is likely to lead to a [[collapse]] as we are living in a [[closed system]] and expecting infinite growth, the dominant organisation are [[Corporate|corporates]] which do not take in to account [[externalities]]. | To solve the issue we need to be mindful of our own [[psychopharmacology]] and out: [[popular delusions]], [[cognitive biases]], [[heuristics]] and [[Psychological fallacies|psychological fallacies.]]To see that we are in a [[climate crisis]] which is likely to lead to a [[collapse]] as we are living in a [[closed system]] and expecting infinite growth, the dominant organisation are [[Corporate|corporates]] which do not take in to account [[externalities]]. | ||
Given our short [[Ecological Crisis Timeline|timeline]], we cannot nudge this issue into submission | Given our short [[Ecological Crisis Timeline|timeline]], we cannot nudge this issue into submission. We need to come together and through [[Political transparency|transparent]] political action cut [[CO2]] emissions not on the basis of [[Net zero]] but by burning zero. It's a long road and there are [[Further stages|lots of further ideas]] but if you want to get involved [[contact us]]. | ||
Revision as of 01:49, 25 January 2022
Look down, we stand on the bones of thousands of generations past.
Look up, the sky, a prediction of Fermi's potential dark future.
We stand on the cusp, but we frame and gas light ourselves to death.
We look outwardly for ecomodern solutions listening to hype cycles of startup culture prophets promising solutions like electric vehicles but most are confounded by Jevons Paradox and the fact that 100 corporation cause 71% of industrial emissions[1].
To solve the issue we need to be mindful of our own psychopharmacology and out: popular delusions, cognitive biases, heuristics and psychological fallacies.To see that we are in a climate crisis which is likely to lead to a collapse as we are living in a closed system and expecting infinite growth, the dominant organisation are corporates which do not take in to account externalities.
Given our short timeline, we cannot nudge this issue into submission. We need to come together and through transparent political action cut CO2 emissions not on the basis of Net zero but by burning zero. It's a long road and there are lots of further ideas but if you want to get involved contact us.
- ↑ Carbon Majors Report - Accessed 25th January 2022 viahttps://climateaccountability.org/carbonmajors.html