Dunning Kruger effect: Difference between revisions
From BurnZero
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Hawkings quote.jpg|alt=Hawkings quote|thumb|False confidence is a dangerous thing.]] | [[File:Hawkings quote.jpg|alt=Hawkings quote|thumb|False confidence is a dangerous thing.]] | ||
'''Dunning-Kruger effect, in psychology, is a [[Cognitive biases|cognitive bias]] whereby people with limited knowledge overestimate their own competence relative to the performance of their peers or of people in general'''<ref> | '''Dunning-Kruger effect, in psychology, is a [[Cognitive biases|cognitive bias]] whereby people with limited knowledge overestimate their own competence relative to the performance of their peers or of people in general'''<ref>'''Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.''' Kruger, Justin & Dunning, David. (2000). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77. 1121-34. 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121. Accessed on 25 January 2023 via https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12688660_Unskilled_and_Unaware_of_It_How_Difficulties_in_Recognizing_One's_Own_Incompetence_Lead_to_Inflated_Self-Assessments </ref>'''.''' | ||
Unfortunately, this has been found to be more pronounced in men<ref>Front. Psychol., Gender Differences in Self-Estimated Intelligence: Exploring the Male Hubris, Female Humility Problem 07 February 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812483 | Unfortunately, this has been found to be more pronounced in men<ref>Front. Psychol., Gender Differences in Self-Estimated Intelligence: Exploring the Male Hubris, Female Humility Problem 07 February 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812483 | ||
Revision as of 06:36, 25 January 2023
Dunning-Kruger effect, in psychology, is a cognitive bias whereby people with limited knowledge overestimate their own competence relative to the performance of their peers or of people in general[1].
Unfortunately, this has been found to be more pronounced in men[2]. Looking at the fact that America's 500 highest-grossing companies, translates to around 85 percent male[3] and compounding this with reduced neuroplasticity of the main CEO age group and a higher representation of psychopathy traits in CEOs, there may be a compound negative feedback loop in the selection of our leaders.
References
- ↑ Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments. Kruger, Justin & Dunning, David. (2000). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77. 1121-34. 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121. Accessed on 25 January 2023 via https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12688660_Unskilled_and_Unaware_of_It_How_Difficulties_in_Recognizing_One's_Own_Incompetence_Lead_to_Inflated_Self-Assessments
- ↑ Front. Psychol., Gender Differences in Self-Estimated Intelligence: Exploring the Male Hubris, Female Humility Problem 07 February 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812483
- ↑ Fortune 500, 2021: https://fortune.com/2021/06/02/female-ceos-fortune-500-2021-women-ceo-list-roz-brewer-walgreens-karen-lynch-cvs-thasunda-brown-duckett-tiaa/